ALthough most of her views on neat people were negative and I do not agree with them, what I liked about the essay was the fact that she took a stand at all. Someday they are planning to alphabetize all their books and set up home catalogs.
For example, her use of overstatements and broad generalizations leads to exaggeration, a tool often used for humorous effect. She is obviously very defensive towards sloppy people, by defending them.
Neat people are lazier and meaner than sloppy people. It makes me happier and motivates me to get more work done. Neat people are especially vicious with mail. This shows that neat and sloppy people share characteristics, even laziness. Similarly, the author displays her dissatisfaction with neat people by complaining that they have no emotion and just throw everything away with out any attempt to save and Neat people vs sloppy people response journal it.
She follows up her point by giving examples that give off the feeling that objects belonging to them are too deeply affected by negative results of their neatness to even borrow them.
Sloppy people live in Never-Never Land. Britt immediately begins her piece by introducing the morality of the types of people she is comparing; however, morality has nothing to do with how neat or sloppy a person would be which begins the ironic tone because these are not two things commonly associated with each other.
And neat people sell their furniture when they move. These wildly contrasting tones help stress the literal contrast between these two wildly different types of people. My family is very neat and organized, but they hold onto many sentimental belongings. She generalizes neat people into cold hearted thoughtless people whereas neat people actually have more energy and happiness than sloppy people.
No sentimental salvaging of birthday cards or the last letter a dying relative ever wrote. As a sloppy person myself, I can agree with some of the things Britt says, there are times when I try to accomplish too much and I end up failing and accomplishing little to nothing.
Laziness is a lack of punctuality for one to complete a certain task. There are certain points to which I can agree upon however the majority of her claims I do not agree upon.
I believe it really depends on the individual and it varies from person to person. She has no factual evidence of this, however, and cannot generalize all neat people into one category. Many people do not get a job because they want to work. I also feel as though Brit herself may be a sloppy person because of the fact that she praised sloppy people so much.
They are incredibly wasteful. The way Suzanne Britt generalizes neat people and defends sloppy people makes me believe that she is a sloppy person. It could be that perhaps sloppy people, in general, are more nostalgic and hold on to things for their love of them whereas neat people are less nostalgic and are more logical people.
Neat people are not always wasteful. This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by.
Nothing makes me crazier than people who stand for nothing. This idea is also repeated in chapter three, four and five, where the explanation of sloppy people is so vivid. Neat people will toy with the idea of throwing the children out of the house just to cut down on the clutter. Someday they will go through their wardrobes and mark certain items for tentative mending and certain items for passing on to relatives of similar shape and size.
They are so insensitive. Am I a sloppy person? By creating these two contrasting tones, Britt adds to the literal contrast between neat and sloppy people.
November 4, at 3: The drainer was too much trouble to wash. Britt was very defensive in her opinion of sloppy people, presumably because she is one herself.
However, I think she is just making excuses for not trying to organize herself and I also strongly agree with Taylor that she may have had a bad experience in the past with a neat person like a roommate, close friend, or even family members. Her accusing tone toward neat people is far more negative than the tone toward sloppy people.
They simply throw away things that they do not need. But while these ambitious plans take clearer and clearer shape in their heads, the books spill from the shelves onto the floor, the clothes pile up in the hamper and closet, the family mementos accumulate in every drawer, the surface of the desk is buried under mounds of paper, and the unread magazines threaten to reach the ceiling.Neat People vs.
Sloppy People. By Suzanne BrittI’ve finally figured out the difference between neat people and sloppy people. The distinction is, as always, moral. Neat people are lazier and meaner than sloppy people.
But I have to do a response essay on it too, and that does kind of drag down the glory. =/ Reply Delete. Neat People. vs. Sloppy People “Neat People vs. Sloppy People” appears in Britt’s collection Show and Tell. Mingling humor with seriousness (as she often does), Britt has called the book a report on her journey into “the awful cave of self: You shout your name and voices come back in exultant response, telling you their names.” In this essay.
Oct 15, · Reading Response: Neat People Vs. Sloppy People Neat people vs. sloppy people was a piece that I found intriguing. The piece compares Britt’s view of a neat person vs. a sloppy person, but it’s not entirely clear what she’s doing.
Reading Response: Me Talk Pretty One Day; Reading Response: Neat People Vs. Sloppy. Neat People vs. Sloppy People By Suzanne Britt I’ve finally figured out the difference between neat people and sloppy people. The distinction is, as always, moral. Neat People vs. Sloppy People essays In Suzanne Britt's essay Neat People vs.
Sloppy People, she carefully and humorously compares the two kinds of individuals. I personally enjoyed her interpretations very much. In her opinion, the variation was not merely the differences in preferences in.
Free College Essay Neat People Vs. Sloppy People. Neat People vs. Sloppy People a) According to Suzanne Britt neat people have a lower moral then sloppy people.